U.S. v. WALTERS, 2:12-cr-00375-TLN. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20170818b66
Visitors: 21
Filed: Aug. 16, 2017
Latest Update: Aug. 16, 2017
Summary: ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR TRANSCRIPT TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . Counsel for Defendant Andre Walters requested a transcript of a July 28, 2016, in camera hearing, at which both Defendant and Defendant's then current counsel were present. The transcript of the in camera hearing is sealed. Standard practice for this Court in criminal matters, pursuant to Local Rule 141(b), is to limit access to documents that are sealed to the government and counsel for Defendant. Where Defendant's cou
Summary: ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR TRANSCRIPT TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . Counsel for Defendant Andre Walters requested a transcript of a July 28, 2016, in camera hearing, at which both Defendant and Defendant's then current counsel were present. The transcript of the in camera hearing is sealed. Standard practice for this Court in criminal matters, pursuant to Local Rule 141(b), is to limit access to documents that are sealed to the government and counsel for Defendant. Where Defendant's coun..
More
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR TRANSCRIPT
TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.
Counsel for Defendant Andre Walters requested a transcript of a July 28, 2016, in camera hearing, at which both Defendant and Defendant's then current counsel were present. The transcript of the in camera hearing is sealed. Standard practice for this Court in criminal matters, pursuant to Local Rule 141(b), is to limit access to documents that are sealed to the government and counsel for Defendant. Where Defendant's counsel is requesting the transcript of the hearing, the Court finds providing the transcript would not harm any of the interests identified in the Court's decision to seal.
The Court directs the court reporter to prepare the transcript of the sealed in camera hearing held on July 28, 2016, and to provide a copy of that transcript to Defendant's counsel of record, Alexis Haller. The Court orders the transcript to otherwise remain sealed unless and until Defendant relies on the transcript in his appeal before the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
