Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Tyurina v. Urbana Tahoe TC LLC, 2:16-cv-00759-TLN-DB. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20170822839 Visitors: 10
Filed: Aug. 21, 2017
Latest Update: Aug. 21, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO PERMIT ADDITIONAL DEPOSITIONS ACTION DEBORAH BARNES , Magistrate Judge . Whereas factual discovery in the present litigation is proceeding with all parties proceeding in good faith, subject to the approval of this Court and pursuant to Fed. Rule of Civ. Proc., Rule 30(a)(2)(A)(i), the parties hereby stipulate to permit additional depositions per party as follows: A. Plaintiff Elena Tyurina: Twenty (20) total depositions; B. Urbana Tahoe TC LLC and Urbana Tahoe Bev
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO PERMIT ADDITIONAL DEPOSITIONS ACTION

Whereas factual discovery in the present litigation is proceeding with all parties proceeding in good faith, subject to the approval of this Court and pursuant to Fed. Rule of Civ. Proc., Rule 30(a)(2)(A)(i), the parties hereby stipulate to permit additional depositions per party as follows:

A. Plaintiff Elena Tyurina: Twenty (20) total depositions; B. Urbana Tahoe TC LLC and Urbana Tahoe Beverage Company, LLC dba Beach Retreat and Lodge Tahoe: Ten (10) total depositions; C. Action Motorsports of Tahoe, Inc.: Ten (10) total depositions.

This stipulation is not intended to limit or restrict future stipulations between the parties to further enlarge the total number of permissible depositions if the same is required by the development of information regarding witnesses and evidence developed in ongoing discovery, or to limit or restrict any party from individually requesting leave of Court to seek leave to notice depositions of fact witnesses in excess of the number set forth herein.

SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer