VALERO REFINING COMPANY - CALIFORNIA v. PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, 2:17-cv-1350-TLN-EFB. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20170825d97
Visitors: 11
Filed: Aug. 23, 2017
Latest Update: Aug. 23, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANT PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY'S MOTION TO DISMISS TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . Plaintiff Valero Refining Company — California ("Valero") and defendant Pacific Gas and Electric Company ("PG&E"), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby agree and stipulate, subject to approval of the Court, that: 1. PG&E shall file and serve any motion to dismiss Valero's Complaint by August 21, 2017 and notice any motio
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANT PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY'S MOTION TO DISMISS TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . Plaintiff Valero Refining Company — California ("Valero") and defendant Pacific Gas and Electric Company ("PG&E"), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby agree and stipulate, subject to approval of the Court, that: 1. PG&E shall file and serve any motion to dismiss Valero's Complaint by August 21, 2017 and notice any motion..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANT PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY'S MOTION TO DISMISS
TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.
Plaintiff Valero Refining Company — California ("Valero") and defendant Pacific Gas and Electric Company ("PG&E"), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby agree and stipulate, subject to approval of the Court, that:
1. PG&E shall file and serve any motion to dismiss Valero's Complaint by August 21, 2017 and notice any motion to dismiss for hearing on October 5, 2017;
2. Valero shall file and serve any opposition to any motion to dismiss the Complaint by September 14, 2017;
3. PG&E shall file and serve any reply to Valero's opposition by September 28, 2017.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
