Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Haddad v. Hilton Worldwide Holdings, Inc., 2:16-CV-00405-MCE-CKD. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20170830748 Visitors: 3
Filed: Aug. 28, 2017
Latest Update: Aug. 28, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION RE DISCOVERY CUT OFF DATE; ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr. , District Judge . The parties are informed and believe that the current discovery cutoff date is August 23, 2017. However, both parties agree for good cause to be shown that this deadline will not allow them to complete all necessary discovery and have stipulated to moving the deadline to October 22, 2017. All other deadlines shall follow the Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order from the Court with the limited exception of
More

STIPULATION RE DISCOVERY CUT OFF DATE; ORDER

The parties are informed and believe that the current discovery cutoff date is August 23, 2017. However, both parties agree for good cause to be shown that this deadline will not allow them to complete all necessary discovery and have stipulated to moving the deadline to October 22, 2017. All other deadlines shall follow the Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order from the Court with the limited exception of certain expert discovery as referenced below.

Defendants anticipate filing a motion to dismiss for improper venue or forum non conviens. The parties hereby stipulate that disclosure of expert witnesses and submission of expert reports shall occur thirty (30) days after the Court's ruling on Defendants' anticipated motion to dismiss. However, in the event such motion is heard and ruled upon by the Court before November 23, 2017, all expert discovery shall commence pursuant to the Court's Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order. One prior request to extend this discovery deadline has been made and this matter has yet to be set for trial.

On July 18, 2017 Plaintiff served a Notice of Deposition of Wolfgang Meier; Notice of Deposition of Person Most Knowledgeable at Hilton Worldwide Holdings, Inc.; and a Notice of Deposition of Person Most Knowledgeable at Hilton Worldwide, Inc. All individuals are believed to be located outside of the United States and Defendants must coordinate and communicate with individuals in Abu Dhabi and Egypt to respond to this request. However, the parties have agreed to cooperate with these requests and Defendants will produce person(s) most knowledgeable and Mr. Meier for depositions to be initiated in the United States pursuant to videoconference and/or telephonic conferences, in the event they have access to either telephonic or videoconference capabilities. Further, Defendants contend that a key eye witness, the masseuse who is alleged to have injured plaintiff, has not been located by Defendants. The masseuse is not employed with Hilton Abu Dhabi and is believed to be living in Qatar.

On August 1, 2017 Defendants served a Notice of Deposition of Plaintiff Fadi Haddad. On August 17, 2017, plaintiff's counsel informed counsel for defendants that plaintiff would be unavailable for deposition.

Both parties are working in good faith to produce their requested witnesses and do not wish to pursue a motion to compel. Because both parties properly noticed depositions prior to the discovery cutoff date and both parties intend to produce witnesses following the cutoff date, both parties would be prejudiced by failure to extend the discovery cutoff date by sixty (60) days.

ORDER

Good cause appearing to amend the pretrial scheduling order, the Court orders that discovery shall be conducted so as to be completed not later than October 22, 2017.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer