Z.F. ex rel. M.A.F. v. Ripon Unified School District, 2:10-CV-00523 TLN-CKD. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20170901a44
Visitors: 7
Filed: Aug. 31, 2017
Latest Update: Aug. 31, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF COUNTER CLAIMS AGAINST M.A.F.; AND ORDER (Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2), 41(c)(2)) TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2) and 41(c)(2) by and between COUNTER-CLAIMANTS VALLEY MOUNTAIN REGIONAL CENTER, TARA SISEMORE-HESTER and RICHARD JACOBS ("Counter-Claimants") and COUNTER-DEFENDANT M.A.F., though their respective counsel of record, that COUNTER-CLAIMANTS' entire counter-comp
Summary: STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF COUNTER CLAIMS AGAINST M.A.F.; AND ORDER (Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2), 41(c)(2)) TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2) and 41(c)(2) by and between COUNTER-CLAIMANTS VALLEY MOUNTAIN REGIONAL CENTER, TARA SISEMORE-HESTER and RICHARD JACOBS ("Counter-Claimants") and COUNTER-DEFENDANT M.A.F., though their respective counsel of record, that COUNTER-CLAIMANTS' entire counter-compl..
More
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF COUNTER CLAIMS AGAINST M.A.F.; AND ORDER (Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2), 41(c)(2))
TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2) and 41(c)(2) by and between COUNTER-CLAIMANTS VALLEY MOUNTAIN REGIONAL CENTER, TARA SISEMORE-HESTER and RICHARD JACOBS ("Counter-Claimants") and COUNTER-DEFENDANT M.A.F., though their respective counsel of record, that COUNTER-CLAIMANTS' entire counter-complaint [Docket No. 21] is dismissed as to the sole remaining COUNTER-DEFENDANT M.A.F. in its entirety, with prejudice, and without costs to either party as to the counter-claims alleged therein.1
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Former Counter-defendant J.A. was dismissed on December 1, 2014 [Docket No. 21]. The other named Counter-defendants, Special Needs Advocates for Understanding and Autism Reform California, were never served and never appeared in the action. Accordingly, the present Stipulation of Dismissal and Order shall function to conclude the counter-complaint [Docket No. 21].
Source: Leagle
