Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Vision Service Plan v. Nouveau Vision, Inc., 2:16-CV-01049-TLN-KJN. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20170901a79 Visitors: 33
Filed: Aug. 30, 2017
Latest Update: Aug. 30, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: SCHEDULING DEPOSITIONS OF DEFENDANTS NOUVEAU VISION, INC. AND TIMOTHY J. SUTICH KENDALL J. NEWMAN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between Plaintiff Vision Service Plan ("VSP" herein) and Defendants Nouveau Vision, Inc. ("Nouveau" herein) and Timothy J. Sutich ("Sutich" herein) (collectively referred to as "Defendants"), through their duly authorized counsel of record, that the following Stipulation may be entered as an order of the Court wit
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: SCHEDULING DEPOSITIONS OF DEFENDANTS NOUVEAU VISION, INC. AND TIMOTHY J. SUTICH

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between Plaintiff Vision Service Plan ("VSP" herein) and Defendants Nouveau Vision, Inc. ("Nouveau" herein) and Timothy J. Sutich ("Sutich" herein) (collectively referred to as "Defendants"), through their duly authorized counsel of record, that the following Stipulation may be entered as an order of the Court with regard to the scheduling of the depositions of Nouveau and Sutich in the above-entitled action.

WHEREAS, on June 12, 2017, Plaintiff VSP served Notices of Deposition of Defendants Nouveau and Sutich and Request for Production of Documents Thereat. The Deposition of Mr. Sutich was scheduled for July 13, 2017 at 10:00 a.m., and the Deposition of the Person Most Knowledgeable ("PMK" herein) of Nouveau was scheduled to commence after the completion of the deposition of Mr. Sutich.

WHEREAS, counsel for Defendants advised that he was unavailable for the scheduled depositions and because of scheduling issues they would need to be continued until mid-August. As a result, it was agreed that the depositions would be continued to a mutually convenient date.

WHEREAS, on July 27, 2017, it was agreed that the depositions of Defendants Sutich and Nouveau would take place on August 22, 2017. Counsel for Defendants also advised that Mr. Sutich would be the sole PMK for Defendant Nouveau. On August 2, 2017, Notices of Deposition of Sutich and Nouveau were served scheduling the depositions for August 22, 2017, in Sacramento, California. In addition, a Notice of Deposition of an uncooperative third party witness was scheduled for August 23, 2017, in San Jose, California.

WHEREAS, on August 17, 2017, counsel for Defendants advised that due to a mistake on their side, Mr. Sutich would not be able to appear on August 22, 2017. Counsel for Plaintiff then proposed a number of alternative dates. Defendants have stated they are available to appear for deposition on September 13, 2017.

WHEREAS, Plaintiff does not desire to have this situation arise again on September 13, 2017, where Defendants assert they are then unavailable.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED AS FOLLOWS:

1. The deposition of Defendant Sutich will take place on Thursday, September 13, 2017 commencing at 10:00 a.m. at the offices of Atkinson Baker located at 641 Fulton Avenue, Suite 200, Sacramento, California 95825. The deposition of Nouveau will then take place immediately after the conclusion of the deposition of Sutich.

2. This Stipulation and Order shall be binding on the parties and treated as if Plaintiff VSP had filed a Motion to Compel the Depositions of Defendants Nouveau and Sutich, and an order has been entered in favor of Plaintiff VSP in accordance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rules 26, 30 and 34.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

The Court accepts this Stipulation of the parties, and enters the above Stipulation as being the ruling of the Court as if Plaintiff VSP had filed a motion to compel the depositions of Defendants Nouveau and Sutich and the motion had been granted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer