Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Saniefar v. Moore, 1:17-cv-00823-LJO-BAM. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20170905b42 Visitors: 7
Filed: Sep. 01, 2017
Latest Update: Sep. 01, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER BARBARA A. McAULIFFE , Magistrate Judge . WHEREAS, a Mandatory Scheduling Conference in this matter is set for September 20, 2017 (Dkt. 5); WHEREAS, Defendants Kenneth Randolph Moore, Geoshua Levinson, West Coast CASp & ADA Services, and Rick D. Moore waived service of summons in this matter and their responsive pleadings are due September 11, 2017 (Dkt. 15); WHEREAS, Plaintiff, Fatemeh Saniefar ("Pl
More

STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER

WHEREAS, a Mandatory Scheduling Conference in this matter is set for September 20, 2017 (Dkt. 5);

WHEREAS, Defendants Kenneth Randolph Moore, Geoshua Levinson, West Coast CASp & ADA Services, and Rick D. Moore waived service of summons in this matter and their responsive pleadings are due September 11, 2017 (Dkt. 15);

WHEREAS, Plaintiff, Fatemeh Saniefar ("Plaintiff"), and Defendants, Tanya E. Moore, Zachary M. Best (erroneously sued herein as "Zachery M. Best"), Mission Law Firm, Moore Law Firm, Ronald D. Moore, Ronny Loreto, Elmer LeRoy Falk, and Marejka Sacks (all defendants are collectively referred to herein as "Defendants," and together with Plaintiff, "the Parties"), previously entered into stipulations granting those defendants to and including September 11, 2017 to file responsive pleadings in this matter (Dkt. 12, 13, and 14);

WHEREAS, Defendants intend to file motions to dismiss on or before the responsive pleading deadline and because Defendants' motions to dismiss have not yet been filed, the Parties agree that it is most efficient and appropriate to continue the Mandatory Scheduling Conference until after Defendants' motions to dismiss are ruled upon;

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate to a continuance of the Mandatory Scheduling Conference currently set for September 20, 2017 to a date at the Court's convenience on or after November 13, 2017 to allow time for Defendants' Motion to Dismiss to be heard and ruled on.

ORDER

The Parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Mandatory Scheduling Conference currently set for September 20, 2017 is continued to Tuesday, November 28, 2017 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 8, before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. The parties are to file their Joint Scheduling Report no later than seven days prior to the conference.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer