Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

CASTRO v. BERRYHILL, 1:16-cv-01154-GSA. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20170907b19
Filed: Sep. 06, 2017
Latest Update: Sep. 06, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT GARY S. AUSTIN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Rose M. Castro (Plaintiff) and Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (Defendant), by and through their respective counsel of record, that Defendant shall have a first extension of time of 7 days to respond to Plaintiff's opening brief and/or to file any cross-motions thereto. This is the first extension of time
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Rose M. Castro (Plaintiff) and Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (Defendant), by and through their respective counsel of record, that Defendant shall have a first extension of time of 7 days to respond to Plaintiff's opening brief and/or to file any cross-motions thereto. This is the first extension of time requested in the above-captioned matter. The current deadline is September 6, 2017 and the new deadline would be September 13, 2017. The deadline for any reply would be September 27, 2017. Defense counsel requests this extension of time due to an inadvertent calendaring issue.

The Parties further stipulate that the Court's Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly.

ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties (Doc. 21), Defendant shall file her response to plaintiff's opening brief on or before September 13, 2017. Any reply thereto shall be filed on or before September 27, 2017.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer