Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. YORK, 1:16-CR-00069 LJO. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20170911796 Visitors: 16
Filed: Sep. 08, 2017
Latest Update: Sep. 08, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR REVIEW OF PERSONNEL RECORDS LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL , Chief District Judge . The United States by and through Philip A. Talbert, U.S. Attorney and Assistant U.S. Attorneys, Kimberly A. Sanchez and Jeffrey A. Spival, and Eric Fogderude, counsel for Trenell Monson and Dale Blickenstaff, counsel for Anthony Windfield stipulate to an inspection of personnel files and an in camera review under the circumstances set forth below based upon a defense request for such
More

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR REVIEW OF PERSONNEL RECORDS

The United States by and through Philip A. Talbert, U.S. Attorney and Assistant U.S. Attorneys, Kimberly A. Sanchez and Jeffrey A. Spival, and Eric Fogderude, counsel for Trenell Monson and Dale Blickenstaff, counsel for Anthony Windfield stipulate to an inspection of personnel files and an in camera review under the circumstances set forth below based upon a defense request for such a review. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C., section 1651(a) which provides, "The Supreme Court and all courts established by Act of Congress may issue all writs necessary or appropriate in aid of their respective jurisdictions and agreeable to the usages and principles of law."

IT IS ORDERED, that California Highway Patrol:

a. Undertake a review of the personnel files of Det. Michael Szatmari and Det. Daniel Sanchez for any disciplinary actions, allegations of misconduct that bear upon credibility, documentation that is relevant to truthfulness or that is exculpatory in nature. The review is to be completed on or before September 12, 2017. Upon completion of the review, the California Highway Patrol shall provide notice to the parties and to the Court, and indictate whether a further in camera review is warranted.

b. Should any such documentation or allegation be found, an in camera review of the documents shall be arranged with the Court to occur on or before September 20, 2017 for a determination of whether the information should be provided to the parties for potential use at trial or any evidentiary hearing at which the witnesses testify.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer