U.S. v. MELLOR, 2:16-CR-068 TLN. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20171004g76
Visitors: 16
Filed: Oct. 02, 2017
Latest Update: Oct. 02, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE AND EXCLUDING TIME UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . The parties to this action, Plaintiff United States of America by and through Assistant United States Attorney Ross K. Naughton, and Defendant Brian Mellor by and through his attorney Todd D. Leras, stipulate as follows: 1. This matter is presently set for a status conference on October 5, 2017. The government previously provided defense counsel with discovery
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE AND EXCLUDING TIME UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . The parties to this action, Plaintiff United States of America by and through Assistant United States Attorney Ross K. Naughton, and Defendant Brian Mellor by and through his attorney Todd D. Leras, stipulate as follows: 1. This matter is presently set for a status conference on October 5, 2017. The government previously provided defense counsel with discovery a..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE AND EXCLUDING TIME UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT
TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.
The parties to this action, Plaintiff United States of America by and through Assistant United States Attorney Ross K. Naughton, and Defendant Brian Mellor by and through his attorney Todd D. Leras, stipulate as follows:
1. This matter is presently set for a status conference on October 5, 2017. The government previously provided defense counsel with discovery and a proposed plea agreement to resolve the matter. In addition, the government recently provided defense counsel with supplemental discovery which the defense believes to be relevant to sentencing of the case.
2. Defense counsel is engaged in continuing review of the proposed plea agreement and supplemental discovery with Defendant. Based on the supplemental discovery, the defense is presently conducting additional investigation regarding information that may be offered to the Court in mitigation of sentence. The defense requires additional time to complete this investigation and is requesting to continue the status conference to October 19, 2017.
3. Counsel for Defendant believes that failure to grant additional time as requested would deny him the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The government does not oppose the request.
4. Based on the above-stated facts, the parties jointly request that the Court find that the ends of justice served by continuing the case as requested outweigh the best interest of the public and the Defendant in a trial within the time prescribed by the Speedy Trial Act.
5. For the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, et seq., within which trial must commence, the time period of October 5, 2017 to October 19, 2017, inclusive, is deemed excludable pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), and (B) (iv) [Local Code T-4] because it results from a continuance granted by the Court at Defendant's request on the basis that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the best interest of the public and the Defendant in a speedy trial.
6. Nothing in this stipulation and order shall preclude a finding that other provisions of the Speedy Trial Act dictate that additional time periods are excludable from the period within which a trial must commence.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Ross Naughton has reviewed this proposed order and authorized Todd Leras to sign it on his behalf.
ORDER
BASED ON THE REPRESENTATIONS AND STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, it is hereby ordered that the status conference in this matter scheduled for October 5, 2017 is vacated. A new status conference is scheduled for October 19, 2017, at 9:30 a.m. The Court further finds, based on the representations of the parties and Defendant's request, that the ends of justice served by granting the continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Time shall be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T-4, to allow necessary attorney preparation taking into consideration the exercise of due diligence for the period from October 5, 2017 up to and including October 19, 2017.
Source: Leagle
