JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge.
Plaintiff is proceeding pro se with the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21).
On July 12, 2017, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days after service of the findings and recommendations. The fourteen-day period has expired, and no party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis.
Accordingly,
1. The findings and recommendations filed July 12, 2017 (ECF No. 37) are adopted in full;
2. Defendants' December 5, 2016 motion to dismiss (ECF No. 30) is granted in part and denied in part;
3. The second amended complaint's
4. The second amended complaint's claim for illegal seizure against defendant County of Sacramento is dismissed without leave to amend;
5. Defendant Nelson and Defendant Kemp are directed to file an answer within fourteen days of the date of this order to the second amended complaint's claims for retaliation in violation of the First Amendment; false arrest; excessive force; and illegal seizure of property; and
6. Defendant County of Sacramento is dismissed from this action.