Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

BANGERT v. COUNTY OF PLACER, 2:17-cv-01667-MCE-GGH. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20171006j79 Visitors: 5
Filed: Sep. 28, 2017
Latest Update: Sep. 28, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr. , District Judge . The parties seek an order from this court to extend the deadline for service of a response to Plaintiff's Complaint by thirty (30) days. The parties have previously stipulated pursuant to Eastern District Local Rule 144(a) to a twenty-eight (28) day extension to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint, which extended Defendants' deadline to respond until October 3, 2017. ( See ECF No. 9.)
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT

The parties seek an order from this court to extend the deadline for service of a response to Plaintiff's Complaint by thirty (30) days. The parties have previously stipulated pursuant to Eastern District Local Rule 144(a) to a twenty-eight (28) day extension to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint, which extended Defendants' deadline to respond until October 3, 2017. (See ECF No. 9.)

Now, the Parties seek the Court's approval of an additional thirty (30) day extension, for good cause and the convenience of the parties, extending Defendants' deadline to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint from October 3, 2017 until November 2, 2017.

ORDER

All Defendants may have an additional thirty (30) days to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. The deadline for Defendants to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is extended until November 2, 2017.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer