Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. NUWINTORE, 2:07-CR-139 WBS AC. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20171012c60 Visitors: 12
Filed: Oct. 10, 2017
Latest Update: Oct. 10, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION REGARDING EVIDENTIARY HEARING; [PROPOSED] ORDER ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendant Richard Nuwintore, by and through his counsel, Charles M. Bonneau, Jr., hereby stipulate as follows: 1. By order of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, this case was remanded to the district court for an evidentiary hearing regarding defendant Nuwintore's petition for writ of error cor
More

STIPULATION REGARDING EVIDENTIARY HEARING; [PROPOSED] ORDER

Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendant Richard Nuwintore, by and through his counsel, Charles M. Bonneau, Jr., hereby stipulate as follows:

1. By order of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, this case was remanded to the district court for an evidentiary hearing regarding defendant Nuwintore's petition for writ of error coram nobis. The Honorable William B. Shubb subsequently referred the case to this Court. ECF No. 159. The Court set this matter for an evidentiary hearing on October 30, 2017.

2. By this stipulation, the parties request that the Court set this matter for an evidentiary hearing to be conducted before the Honorable Allison Claire on November 14, 2017, at 9:00 a.m. The parties anticipate that the evidentiary hearing will last one court day, and will include live testimony from at least two witnesses.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer