Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Newberry v. Commissioner of Social Security, 2:17-cv-00316-CMK. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20171021i57 Visitors: 7
Filed: Oct. 17, 2017
Latest Update: Oct. 17, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME [Fed.R.Civ.P. 6] CRAIG M. KELLISON , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff requests an extension of thitry (30) days for Plaintiff's counsel to draft and file a reply to Defendant's cross-motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff's counsel has had multiple demands in other cases resulting in scheduling difficulties. The parties request this extension in good faith, with no intent to prolong proceedings unduly. Defendant does not object to allowing Plaintiff
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME [Fed.R.Civ.P. 6]

Plaintiff requests an extension of thitry (30) days for Plaintiff's counsel to draft and file a reply to Defendant's cross-motion for summary judgment.

Plaintiff's counsel has had multiple demands in other cases resulting in scheduling difficulties. The parties request this extension in good faith, with no intent to prolong proceedings unduly.

Defendant does not object to allowing Plaintiff the additional time to draft his motion for summary judgment and, subject to the Court's approval, stipulates to thirty (30) days extension of time to allow Plaintiff to file his motion for summary judgment in this action. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment or remand is now due on October 30, 2017. This is Plaintiff's first request for additional time.

SO STIPULATED AND AGREED.

SO ORDERED.

DECLARATION OF CONCURRENCE OF SIGNATURE

GENERAL ORDER 131, X

I, Robert C. Weems, hereby declare and attest that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from each of the other signatories, or from the single signatory (in the case, e.g., of a declaration) whose signature is indicated by the notation " /s/ [name of signatory]."1

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct.

/s/Robert C. Weems Robert C. Weems

FootNotes


1. The filer shall maintain records to support this concurrence for subsequent production for the Court if so ordered or for inspection upon request by a party until one year after final resolution of the action (including appeal, if any) unless filer has attached a scanned image of the signature page(s) of the document being electronically filed in lieu of maintaining the paper record for subsequent production if required.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer