(PC) Mizerak v. Eslick, 2:16-cv-0323 CKD P. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20171026894
Visitors: 9
Filed: Oct. 18, 2017
Latest Update: Oct. 18, 2017
Summary: ORDER CAROLYN K. DELANEY , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff has filed a motion for an extension of time to file an opposition to defendant Eslick and Foxworthy's motion to dismiss. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 47) is granted; and 2. Plaintiff is granted until November 20, 2017 to file an opposition to defendant Eslick and Foxworthy's motion to dismiss. Plaintiff's failure to file an opposition by that date will result
Summary: ORDER CAROLYN K. DELANEY , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff has filed a motion for an extension of time to file an opposition to defendant Eslick and Foxworthy's motion to dismiss. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 47) is granted; and 2. Plaintiff is granted until November 20, 2017 to file an opposition to defendant Eslick and Foxworthy's motion to dismiss. Plaintiff's failure to file an opposition by that date will result ..
More
ORDER
CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff has filed a motion for an extension of time to file an opposition to defendant Eslick and Foxworthy's motion to dismiss. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 47) is granted; and
2. Plaintiff is granted until November 20, 2017 to file an opposition to defendant Eslick and Foxworthy's motion to dismiss. Plaintiff's failure to file an opposition by that date will result in dismissal.
Source: Leagle
