Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Whitehead v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston, 1:17-cv-01204-LJO-JLT. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20171026b59 Visitors: 11
Filed: Oct. 24, 2017
Latest Update: Oct. 24, 2017
Summary: ORDER APPROVING THE STIPULATION FOR AN EXTENTION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT (Doc. 12) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . On October 20, 2017, the parties filed a stipulation for an extension of time for Defendant to file and serve its response to Plaintiff's Complaint. (Doc. 12 at 1) Pursuant to Local Rule 144(a), the parties may stipulation to an extension of time "no more than twenty-eight (28) to respond to a complaint . . . without approval of the Court if
More

ORDER APPROVING THE STIPULATION FOR AN EXTENTION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT

(Doc. 12)

On October 20, 2017, the parties filed a stipulation for an extension of time for Defendant to file and serve its response to Plaintiff's Complaint. (Doc. 12 at 1) Pursuant to Local Rule 144(a), the parties may stipulation to an extension of time "no more than twenty-eight (28) to respond to a complaint . . . without approval of the Court if the extension is signed on behalf of all parties who have appeared in the action and are affected by the stipulation."

Accordingly, pursuant to the terms of the stipulation, the motion for an extension of time is GRANTED and Defendant SHALL file a response to the complaint no later than November 6, 2017.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer