DEBORAH BARNES, Magistrate Judge.
Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with an application for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner contends, among other things, he is actually innocent, he was incompetent at the time of the crime and at the time he rendered his plea, his trial and appellate attorneys rendered ineffective assistance, and the district attorney withheld exculpatory evidence. Before the court are respondent's motion to dismiss the petition as untimely and multiple motions filed by petitioner, including motions for the appointment of counsel, for an evidentiary hearing, and for scribing assistance.
After reviewing the briefs in support of and opposing respondent's motion to dismiss, and in light of the complexity of the legal issues involved, the court has determined that the interests of justice require appointment of counsel for the limited purpose of opposing the motion to dismiss.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The Federal Defender is appointed to represent petitioner for the limited purpose of opposing the motion to dismiss.
2. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this order on the Federal Defender, Attention: Habeas Appointment.
3. Petitioner's counsel shall contact the Clerk's Office to make arrangements for copies of documents in the file.
4. Within forty-five days of the date of this order, petitioner's counsel shall file an amended opposition to the motion to dismiss (ECF No. 51) or inform the court that an amended opposition is unnecessary. If petitioner's counsel files an amended opposition to the motion to dismiss, respondent may file a reply within twenty days of the date of service of that amended opposition.
5. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the office of the Federal Defender.
6. Petitioner's motions for the appointment of counsel and related motions for reconsideration (ECF Nos. 47, 52, 53, 57, 59, 85, 86) and for scribing assistance (ECF No. 68) are denied as moot.
7. Petitioner's motion for an evidentiary hearing regarding his competence (ECF No. 65) is denied without prejudice.