Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

The California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. CEMEX Construction Materials Pacific, LLC, 2:17-cv-00272-MCE-CKD. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20171102a59 Visitors: 2
Filed: Oct. 31, 2017
Latest Update: Oct. 31, 2017
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT BY 60 ADDITIONAL DAYS; ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr. , Magistrate Judge . WHEREAS, the complaint in this action was filed on February 8, 2017 ("Complaint") by plaintiff The California Sportfishing Protection Alliance ("Plaintiff") against defendant CEMEX Construction Materials Pacific, LLC ("Defendant"); WHEREAS, Defendant waived service on May 2, 2017; WHEREAS, pursuant to Local Rule 144, Plaintiff and Defendant stipulated
More

JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT BY 60 ADDITIONAL DAYS; ORDER

WHEREAS, the complaint in this action was filed on February 8, 2017 ("Complaint") by plaintiff The California Sportfishing Protection Alliance ("Plaintiff") against defendant CEMEX Construction Materials Pacific, LLC ("Defendant");

WHEREAS, Defendant waived service on May 2, 2017;

WHEREAS, pursuant to Local Rule 144, Plaintiff and Defendant stipulated to extend Defendant's time to respond to the Complaint by 28 days on June 28, 2017;

WHEREAS, Judge England granted the Parties' Stipulation for Order Extending Time on July 31, 2017;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendant stipulated to extend Defendant's time to respond to the Complaint by an additional 60 days on August 23, 2017.

WHEREAS, Judge England granted the Parties' Joint Stipulation for Order to Extend Time to Respond to Initial Complaint on August 28, 2017.

WHEREAS, Defendant must currently respond to the Complaint by October 27, 2017;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendant have agreed on material terms of settlement and have drafted the written settlement agreement;

WHEREAS, the settlement agreement must now be reviewed by the United States Department of Justice;

WHEREAS, in light of ongoing settlement discussions, the parties believe it to further the interests of judicial economy to extend the time for Defendant to respond to the Complaint by an additional 60 days; and

THEREFORE, Plaintiff and Defendant hereby stipulate that Defendant may respond to the Complaint by no later than December 26, 2017.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

Having read and considered the Joint Stipulation for Order Extending Time to Respond to Initial Complaint of CEMEX CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS PACIFIC, LLC ("Defendant") and THE CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE ("Plaintiff"), and good cause appearing therefore,

IT IS SO ORDERED that the stipulation is granted as follows: Defendant shall have an extension of time, up to and including December 26, 2017, to file a responsive pleading to Plaintiff's initial complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer