BOARDS OF TRUSTEES OF THE ROOFERS LOCAL 27 HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST FUND v. ROSIE THE ROOFER LLC, 1:17-cv-01049-AWI-EPG. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20171106632
Visitors: 2
Filed: Nov. 03, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 03, 2017
Summary: ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE COURT TO CLOSE CASE (ECF No. 8) ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . On November 2, 2017, Board of Trustees of the Roofers Local 27 Health and Welfare Trust Fund, Roofers Local 27, Fresno Roofing Contractors Vacation Fund, and Roofers Local 27 Apprenticeship Training Fund filed a request for dismissal of this action without prejudice against all defendants, Rosie the Roofer LLC, Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, and Does 1 through 50. (ECF No. 8.)
Summary: ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE COURT TO CLOSE CASE (ECF No. 8) ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . On November 2, 2017, Board of Trustees of the Roofers Local 27 Health and Welfare Trust Fund, Roofers Local 27, Fresno Roofing Contractors Vacation Fund, and Roofers Local 27 Apprenticeship Training Fund filed a request for dismissal of this action without prejudice against all defendants, Rosie the Roofer LLC, Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, and Does 1 through 50. (ECF No. 8.) ..
More
ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE COURT TO CLOSE CASE
(ECF No. 8)
ERICA P. GROSJEAN, Magistrate Judge.
On November 2, 2017, Board of Trustees of the Roofers Local 27 Health and Welfare Trust Fund, Roofers Local 27, Fresno Roofing Contractors Vacation Fund, and Roofers Local 27 Apprenticeship Training Fund filed a request for dismissal of this action without prejudice against all defendants, Rosie the Roofer LLC, Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, and Does 1 through 50. (ECF No. 8.) Thus, the case has ended and is dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997); Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493, 1506 (9th Cir. 1995) ("Even if the defendant has filed a motion to dismiss, the plaintiff may terminate his action voluntarily by filing a notice of dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1)."). Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
