Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States of America v. Somina, Inc.,, 1:15-CV-00433-DAD-EPG. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20171117a18 Visitors: 8
Filed: Nov. 16, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 16, 2017
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND ORDER ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Nicole O'Neill ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Somnia, Inc., Primary Anesthesia Services, PST Services LLC, Byron Mendenhall, M.D., Quinn Gee, M.D. and Margaret Vassilev, M.D. ("Defendants"), hereby jointly stipulate as follows: 1. WHEREAS, on August 21, 2017, Defendants each filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint. (Dkt. Nos. 45 and 48.) 2. WHEREAS, on October 4, 2017, Plai
More

JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND ORDER

Plaintiff Nicole O'Neill ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Somnia, Inc., Primary Anesthesia Services, PST Services LLC, Byron Mendenhall, M.D., Quinn Gee, M.D. and Margaret Vassilev, M.D. ("Defendants"), hereby jointly stipulate as follows:

1. WHEREAS, on August 21, 2017, Defendants each filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint. (Dkt. Nos. 45 and 48.)

2. WHEREAS, on October 4, 2017, Plaintiff filed an Oppositions to the Motions to Dismiss. (Dkt. No. 54 and 55.)

3. WHEREAS, on October 18, 2017, Defendants filed Reply Briefs in support of their Motions to Dismiss. (Dkt. Nos. 56 and 57.)

4. WHEREAS, on November 7, 2017, the Court heard oral arguments on the Motions to Dismiss and took them under submission.

5. WHEREAS, as the date of this filing, the Court has not ruled on Defendants' Motions to Dismiss.

6. WHEREAS, the Court has set the Initial Scheduling Conference for December 4, 2017 before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. (Dkt. No. 44)

7. WHEREAS, based on the date currently set for the Initial Scheduling Conference, the Parties must submit a Joint Scheduling Report and initial disclosures by November 27, 2017.

8. WHEREAS, the Parties wish to continue the Initial Scheduling Conference to a date at least three weeks after the Court rules on the Motions to Dismiss. Continuing the Initial Scheduling Conference to a date after the Motions to Dismiss have been decided will allow the remaining Parties to engage in more considered meet and confer discussions regarding the Joint Scheduling Report, draft more useful initial disclosures, and will result in a more meaningful Initial Scheduling Conference.

NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereby jointly stipulate as follows:

1. The Parties hereby respectfully request the Court continue the Initial Scheduling

Conference currently set for December 4, 2017, to a date at least three weeks after the Court's ruling on the Motions to Dismiss. The parties shall submit a Joint Scheduling Report and exchange initial disclosures at least seven days before the date of the rescheduled Initial Scheduling Conference.

I hereby attest that the signatories listed, and on whose behalf the filing is submitted, concur in this document's content and have authorized the filing of this document with the use of their electronic signature.

ORDER

Good cause appearing, the Initial Scheduling Conference currently set for December 4, 2017 is continued to January 22, 2018 at 9:00 a.m. The parties shall submit a Joint Scheduling Report and exchange initial disclosures at least seven days before the date of the Initial Scheduling Conference.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer