(SS) Gallegos v. Commissioner of Social Security, 1:17-cv-0227-JLT. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20171128794
Visitors: 14
Filed: Nov. 27, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 27, 2017
Summary: ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME (Doc. 19) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . On November 26, 2017, the parties stipulated for an extension of time for Defendant to file a response to the opening brief. (Doc. 19) Notably, the Scheduling Order permits a single thirty-day extension by the stipulation of parties. (Doc. 6-1 at 4) Defendant asserts additional time is necessary "to expend the necessary time to review the record and to evaluate the issues Plaintiff raised." (Doc. 19 at 2)
Summary: ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME (Doc. 19) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . On November 26, 2017, the parties stipulated for an extension of time for Defendant to file a response to the opening brief. (Doc. 19) Notably, the Scheduling Order permits a single thirty-day extension by the stipulation of parties. (Doc. 6-1 at 4) Defendant asserts additional time is necessary "to expend the necessary time to review the record and to evaluate the issues Plaintiff raised." (Doc. 19 at 2) B..
More
ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME
(Doc. 19)
JENNIFER L. THURSTON, Magistrate Judge.
On November 26, 2017, the parties stipulated for an extension of time for Defendant to file a response to the opening brief. (Doc. 19) Notably, the Scheduling Order permits a single thirty-day extension by the stipulation of parties. (Doc. 6-1 at 4) Defendant asserts additional time is necessary "to expend the necessary time to review the record and to evaluate the issues Plaintiff raised." (Doc. 19 at 2) Based upon the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, the Court ORDERS:
1. The request for an extension of time is GRANTED; and
2. Defendant SHALL file a response to the opening brief no later than January 3, 2018.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
