USA v. Armendariz, Jr., 1:17-mj-00123-SAB. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20171128798
Visitors: 24
Filed: Nov. 27, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 27, 2017
Summary: REQUEST FOR RULE 43 WAIVER OF APPEARANCE AT NON-SUBSTANTIVE PROCEEDINGS; ORDER STANLEY A. BOONE , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 43(b)(3), Robert Armendariz, Jr., having been advised of his right to be present at all stages of the proceedings, hereby requests that this Court permit him to waive his right to personally appear at the December 14, 2017 evidentiary hearing. Mr. Armendariz agrees that his interests shall be represented at all times by the prese
Summary: REQUEST FOR RULE 43 WAIVER OF APPEARANCE AT NON-SUBSTANTIVE PROCEEDINGS; ORDER STANLEY A. BOONE , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 43(b)(3), Robert Armendariz, Jr., having been advised of his right to be present at all stages of the proceedings, hereby requests that this Court permit him to waive his right to personally appear at the December 14, 2017 evidentiary hearing. Mr. Armendariz agrees that his interests shall be represented at all times by the presen..
More
REQUEST FOR RULE 43 WAIVER OF APPEARANCE AT NON-SUBSTANTIVE PROCEEDINGS; ORDER
STANLEY A. BOONE, Magistrate Judge.
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 43(b)(3), Robert Armendariz, Jr., having been advised of his right to be present at all stages of the proceedings, hereby requests that this Court permit him to waive his right to personally appear at the December 14, 2017 evidentiary hearing. Mr. Armendariz agrees that his interests shall be represented at all times by the presence of his attorney, the Office of the Federal Defender for the Eastern District of California, the same as if he were personally present, and requests that this Court allow his attorney-in-fact to represent his interests at all times.
ORDER
Defendant's request for a waiver of appearance is granted. Defendant's appearance is waived at the December 14, 2017 evidentiary hearing.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle