USA v. Galvan, 2:12-cr-00115-TLN. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20171128819
Visitors: 7
Filed: Nov. 27, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 27, 2017
Summary: ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR RETURN OF PROPERTY TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on Defendant Alejandro Munoz Galvan's ("Defendant") Motion for Return of Property. (ECF No. 172.) Defendant moves for the return of several items the Defendant alleges the government seized from him at the time of his arrest. (ECF No. 172 at 1.) The government argues Defendant filed a notice of appeal [No. 16-10513] 1 , and "[u]ntil the appeal is adjudicated, the possibi
Summary: ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR RETURN OF PROPERTY TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on Defendant Alejandro Munoz Galvan's ("Defendant") Motion for Return of Property. (ECF No. 172.) Defendant moves for the return of several items the Defendant alleges the government seized from him at the time of his arrest. (ECF No. 172 at 1.) The government argues Defendant filed a notice of appeal [No. 16-10513] 1 , and "[u]ntil the appeal is adjudicated, the possibil..
More
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR RETURN OF PROPERTY
TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendant Alejandro Munoz Galvan's ("Defendant") Motion for Return of Property. (ECF No. 172.) Defendant moves for the return of several items the Defendant alleges the government seized from him at the time of his arrest. (ECF No. 172 at 1.) The government argues Defendant filed a notice of appeal [No. 16-10513]1, and "[u]ntil the appeal is adjudicated, the possibility exists that the case might have to go to trial and the seized evidence cannot be returned." (ECF No. 175 at 1.) The government disputes some items on Defendant's list but adds the F.B.I. may return property with no evidentiary value. (ECF No. 175 at 1 & n.4.) The Court DENIES Defendant's Motion for Return of Property (ECF No. 172).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. "[U]nder Federal Rule of Evidence 201, a court may take judicial notice of `matters of public record.'" Lee v. City of Los Angeles, 250 F.3d 668, 689 (9th Cir. 2001).
Source: Leagle
