(PC) Green v. Sherman,, 1:15-cv-1548-LJO-MJS (PC). (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20171204849
Visitors: 7
Filed: Nov. 30, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 30, 2017
Summary: ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION OBJECTING TO ANY EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (ECF NO. 36) MICHAEL J. SENG , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion objecting to any extension of time for Defendants to respond to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. Since that pleading was dismi
Summary: ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION OBJECTING TO ANY EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (ECF NO. 36) MICHAEL J. SENG , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion objecting to any extension of time for Defendants to respond to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. Since that pleading was dismis..
More
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION OBJECTING TO ANY EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
(ECF NO. 36)
MICHAEL J. SENG, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion objecting to any extension of time for Defendants to respond to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. Since that pleading was dismissed on June 8, 2017, for failure to state a claim (see ECF No. 35), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion (ECF No. 36) is DENIED as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
