USA v. Kuzmenko, 2:12-cr-062 JAM. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20171205769
Visitors: 10
Filed: Dec. 01, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 01, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE RE: MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN Assistant United States Attorney Lee Bickley, counsel for Plaintiff, and Jeffrey L. Staniels, CJA counsel for Defendant, that the hearing date now calendared for December 5, 2017, be vacated, and that the matter be re-calendared for January 23, 2018. This continuance is requested by the defense in order to permit further research concerning legal i
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE RE: MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN Assistant United States Attorney Lee Bickley, counsel for Plaintiff, and Jeffrey L. Staniels, CJA counsel for Defendant, that the hearing date now calendared for December 5, 2017, be vacated, and that the matter be re-calendared for January 23, 2018. This continuance is requested by the defense in order to permit further research concerning legal is..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE RE: MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL
JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN Assistant United States Attorney Lee Bickley, counsel for Plaintiff, and Jeffrey L. Staniels, CJA counsel for Defendant, that the hearing date now calendared for December 5, 2017, be vacated, and that the matter be re-calendared for January 23, 2018. This continuance is requested by the defense in order to permit further research concerning legal issues raised in the Government's Opposition to the motion. The request is not opposed by the Government. Provisions of the Speedy Trial Act are not implicated by these proceedings or by this request for a delay.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
