Mendoza v. General Motors LLC, 1:16-cv-0967-LJO-JLT. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20171207858
Visitors: 12
Filed: Dec. 05, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 05, 2017
Summary: ORDER AFTER TELEPHONIC CONFERENCE JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . The Court held a telephonic conference related to the defendants' motion for additional time to disclose their experts. (See Doc. 35) During the conference, counsel agreed that the defendants would have four additional weeks to make the disclosure despite that the defendants preferred six weeks. This agreement was with the understanding that the plaintiff would have additional time to make her rebuttal disclosures a
Summary: ORDER AFTER TELEPHONIC CONFERENCE JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . The Court held a telephonic conference related to the defendants' motion for additional time to disclose their experts. (See Doc. 35) During the conference, counsel agreed that the defendants would have four additional weeks to make the disclosure despite that the defendants preferred six weeks. This agreement was with the understanding that the plaintiff would have additional time to make her rebuttal disclosures an..
More
ORDER AFTER TELEPHONIC CONFERENCE
JENNIFER L. THURSTON, Magistrate Judge.
The Court held a telephonic conference related to the defendants' motion for additional time to disclose their experts. (See Doc. 35) During the conference, counsel agreed that the defendants would have four additional weeks to make the disclosure despite that the defendants preferred six weeks. This agreement was with the understanding that the plaintiff would have additional time to make her rebuttal disclosures and that the non-dispositive motions deadline would be extended. Thus, the Court orders:
1. The defendants SHALL disclose their experts no later than December 27, 2017 and the plaintiff SHALL disclose any rebuttal experts no later than January 24, 2018;
2. Non-dispositive motions SHALL be filed no later than February 28, 2018 and heard no later than March 28, 2018;
3. Defendants' motion for the six-week extension is TERMINATED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
