Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Blankenship v. The Golden 1 Credit Union, 2:17-cv-02197-TLN-KJN. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20171207919 Visitors: 23
Filed: Dec. 05, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 05, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . Larry Blankenship (the "Plaintiff") and The Golden 1 Credit Union (the "Defendant") (collectively, the " Parties "), through their respective counsel, enter into this Stipulation for Extension of Time for Defendant to Respond to the Complaint (the "Stipulation") and hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 1. The Parties agree and stipulate that the time within which Defendant may answer
More

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Larry Blankenship (the "Plaintiff") and The Golden 1 Credit Union (the "Defendant") (collectively, the "Parties"), through their respective counsel, enter into this Stipulation for Extension of Time for Defendant to Respond to the Complaint (the "Stipulation") and hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

1. The Parties agree and stipulate that the time within which Defendant may answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint [Dkt. 1] is hereby extended for one week, to and including December 4, 2017.

2. No other extension of this deadline has been previously requested.

I, the filer of this document, attest that each of the other signatories have consented to the filing of this document.

ORDER

Based on the Parties' Stipulation, and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Defendant, The Golden 1 Credit Union shall have until Monday, December 4, 2017 to answer or other respond to the Complaint.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer