Robles v. County of Sacramento, 2:17-cv-01580-JAM-GGH. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20171211851
Visitors: 12
Filed: Dec. 08, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 08, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION TO FURTHER EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; ORDER JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . Plaintiff PABLO ROBLES, by and through his counsel of record, hereby agrees to extend the time for Defendant COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO to respond to the Complaint of Plaintiff to January 15, 2017. Good cause exists for this extension, as the individual defendants have not been served, and Plaintiff continues to intend to amend the complaint which may include omitting certain defendants, obviating
Summary: STIPULATION TO FURTHER EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; ORDER JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . Plaintiff PABLO ROBLES, by and through his counsel of record, hereby agrees to extend the time for Defendant COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO to respond to the Complaint of Plaintiff to January 15, 2017. Good cause exists for this extension, as the individual defendants have not been served, and Plaintiff continues to intend to amend the complaint which may include omitting certain defendants, obviating t..
More
STIPULATION TO FURTHER EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; ORDER
JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge.
Plaintiff PABLO ROBLES, by and through his counsel of record, hereby agrees to extend the time for Defendant COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO to respond to the Complaint of Plaintiff to January 15, 2017. Good cause exists for this extension, as the individual defendants have not been served, and Plaintiff continues to intend to amend the complaint which may include omitting certain defendants, obviating the need to serve them and/or will narrow the scope of the suit, and Plaintiff's counsel needs additional time to communicate with his client regarding the scope of the amendments. Unfortunately, counsel for Plaintiff and Plaintiff temporarily lost contact due to his incarceration and recently-discovered move to La Palma Correctional Facility in Eloy, Arizona, and thus additional time is necessary to allow for the typically-delayed communications for out-of-state incarcerated individuals.
ORDER
GOOD CAUSE appearing, the Court hereby grants an extension of time for Defendant COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO to respond to Plaintiffs' complaint to January 15, 2017.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
