Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

(PS) Hoffmann v. Lassen County, 2:16-cv-00946-JAM-AC. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20171211862 Visitors: 6
Filed: Dec. 07, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 07, 2017
Summary: ORDER ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this case, and the matter was accordingly referred to the undersigned for pretrial matters pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On October 26, 2017, defendants submitted a motion for attorneys' fees. ECF No. 39. Plaintiff has not responded. Plaintiff has twenty-one (21) days from the date of this order to respond to defendants' motion, and the lack of response will be construed as non-opposition. If plaintiff files a
More

ORDER

Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this case, and the matter was accordingly referred to the undersigned for pretrial matters pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On October 26, 2017, defendants submitted a motion for attorneys' fees. ECF No. 39. Plaintiff has not responded. Plaintiff has twenty-one (21) days from the date of this order to respond to defendants' motion, and the lack of response will be construed as non-opposition. If plaintiff files a response, defendants will have seven (7) days from the date a response is filed to file a reply brief. When the deadline to file a response or reply has passed, the matter will be taken under submission.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer