(PS) Jordan v. California Department of Justice, 2:16-cv-02442-KJM-AC. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20171211865
Visitors: 3
Filed: Dec. 08, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 08, 2017
Summary: ORDER ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . Following the withdrawal of counsel, plaintiff is proceeding in this matter pro se, and all pretrial matters are accordingly referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). ECF No. 22 at 23. As noted in the minute order issued December 1, 2017, all motions should now be noticed for hearing before the undersigned. ECF No. 23. Upon review of the docket, the undersigned has determined that the scheduling order issued by District Judge Ki
Summary: ORDER ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . Following the withdrawal of counsel, plaintiff is proceeding in this matter pro se, and all pretrial matters are accordingly referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). ECF No. 22 at 23. As noted in the minute order issued December 1, 2017, all motions should now be noticed for hearing before the undersigned. ECF No. 23. Upon review of the docket, the undersigned has determined that the scheduling order issued by District Judge Kim..
More
ORDER
ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge.
Following the withdrawal of counsel, plaintiff is proceeding in this matter pro se, and all pretrial matters are accordingly referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). ECF No. 22 at 23. As noted in the minute order issued December 1, 2017, all motions should now be noticed for hearing before the undersigned. ECF No. 23. Upon review of the docket, the undersigned has determined that the scheduling order issued by District Judge Kimberly J. Muller, ECF No. 19, remains appropriate. All deadlines previously set remain binding on the parties.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
