Bird v. Wells Fargo Bank, 1:16-cv-01130-DAD-EPG. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20171214b68
Visitors: 9
Filed: Dec. 13, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 13, 2017
Summary: ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO CLOSE CASE (ECF No. 99) ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . On December 12, 2017, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss this action with prejudice. (ECF No. 99.) All parties have agreed to the dismissal. Id. In light of the stipulation, the case has ended and is dismissed with prejudice and with fees and costs to be addressed pursuant to the parties' private agreement. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688 , 69
Summary: ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO CLOSE CASE (ECF No. 99) ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . On December 12, 2017, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss this action with prejudice. (ECF No. 99.) All parties have agreed to the dismissal. Id. In light of the stipulation, the case has ended and is dismissed with prejudice and with fees and costs to be addressed pursuant to the parties' private agreement. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688 , 692..
More
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO CLOSE CASE
(ECF No. 99)
ERICA P. GROSJEAN, Magistrate Judge.
On December 12, 2017, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss this action with prejudice. (ECF No. 99.) All parties have agreed to the dismissal. Id. In light of the stipulation, the case has ended and is dismissed with prejudice and with fees and costs to be addressed pursuant to the parties' private agreement. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997); Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493, 1506 (9th Cir. 1995) ("Even if the defendant has filed a motion to dismiss, the plaintiff may terminate his action voluntarily by filing a notice of dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1)."). Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
