Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Weeks v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, 13-cv-01641-AWI-JLT. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20171222c05 Visitors: 2
Filed: Dec. 21, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 21, 2017
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S REQUEST TO SEAL DOCUMENT [USDC Eastern District Local Rule 141] ANTHONY W. ISHII , Senior District Judge . Having reviewed defendant's Notice of Request to Seal Document, defendant's Request to Seal Document, and the proposed sealed document (a release agreement purportedly signed by plaintiff in connection with a previous lawsuit against defendant, which contains a confidentiality clause and which defendant seeks to attach as an exhibit to a motion
More

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S REQUEST TO SEAL DOCUMENT

[USDC Eastern District Local Rule 141]

Having reviewed defendant's Notice of Request to Seal Document, defendant's Request to Seal Document, and the proposed sealed document (a release agreement purportedly signed by plaintiff in connection with a previous lawsuit against defendant, which contains a confidentiality clause and which defendant seeks to attach as an exhibit to a motion in limine), and good cause appearing therefore, defendant's Request to Seal Document is hereby GRANTED. The release agreement SHALL BE SEALED for the duration of this litigation and cannot be unsealed without a subsequent order from this Court.

When defendant files its motion in limine regarding its prior settlement with plaintiff, defendant shall file the Release under seal, and ensure that a true and correct copy of the Release is provided to Plaintiff in preparation for the hearing on motions in limine.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer