Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Hopson v. American Tire Depot, Inc., 1:17-cv-00880-LJO-SAB. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20171226446 Visitors: 14
Filed: Dec. 22, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 22, 2017
Summary: ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL (ECF No. 14) STANLEY A. BOONE , Magistrate Judge . On July 4, 2017, Plaintiff William Hopson filed this action alleging violations the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and state law. (ECF No. 1.) On December 21, 2017, Plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. "[U]nder Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i), `a plaintiff h
More

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

(ECF No. 14)

On July 4, 2017, Plaintiff William Hopson filed this action alleging violations the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and state law. (ECF No. 1.) On December 21, 2017, Plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

"[U]nder Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i), `a plaintiff has an absolute right to voluntarily dismiss his action prior to service by the defendant of an answer or a motion for summary judgment.'" Commercial Space Mgmt. Co., Inc. v. Boeing Co., Inc., 193 F.3d 1074, 1077 (9th Cir. 1999) (quoting Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997)). The Ninth Circuit has held that Rule 41(a) allows a plaintiff to dismiss without a court order any defendant who has yet to serve an answer or motion for summary judgment. Pedrina v. Chun, 987 F.2d 608, 609 (9th Cir. 1993). "[A] dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1) is effective on filing, no court order is required, the parties are left as though no action had been brought, the defendant can't complain, and the district court lacks jurisdiction to do anything about it." Commercial Space Mgmt. Co., Inc., 193 F.3d at 1078. In this action, no defendant has filed an answer or other responsive pleading.

Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to CLOSE the file in this case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule 41(a).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer