Andrew v. City of Sacramento, 2:17-cv-02266-JAM-KJN. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20171226466
Visitors: 14
Filed: Dec. 22, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 22, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT (SECOND REQUEST) JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 144(a), Plaintiffs Chris Andrew and Richard Mayberry ("Plaintiffs") and Defendants City of Sacramento (the "City"), Nationwide Investment Services Corporation ("Nationwide"), and International City/County Managers Association-Retirement Corporation ("ICMA") (collectively, "Defendants") hereby stipulate and agree, subject to Court approval, to exte
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT (SECOND REQUEST) JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 144(a), Plaintiffs Chris Andrew and Richard Mayberry ("Plaintiffs") and Defendants City of Sacramento (the "City"), Nationwide Investment Services Corporation ("Nationwide"), and International City/County Managers Association-Retirement Corporation ("ICMA") (collectively, "Defendants") hereby stipulate and agree, subject to Court approval, to exten..
More
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT (SECOND REQUEST)
JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge.
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 144(a), Plaintiffs Chris Andrew and Richard Mayberry ("Plaintiffs") and Defendants City of Sacramento (the "City"), Nationwide Investment Services Corporation ("Nationwide"), and International City/County Managers Association-Retirement Corporation ("ICMA") (collectively, "Defendants") hereby stipulate and agree, subject to Court approval, to extend the time for Defendants to respond to the Complaint by 45 days, such that Defendants new response date would be February 19, 2018. The parties have agreed to enter into settlement discussions, and postponing the deadline for Defendants to respond to the Complaint would allow the parties to focus their efforts on these discussions, rather than on drafting responsive pleadings or motions. This is the second time each Defendant has requested Court approval for an extension of time to respond to the Complaint. Each Defendant previously filed a stipulated request for an extension to respond to the Complaint until January 5, 2018, all of which were subsequently granted by the Court. See Doc. Nos. 9, 12 & 13. These prior stipulations extended Nationwide's and the City's time to respond to the Complaint by 45 days (Doc. Nos. 9 & 12), and extended ICMA's time to respond to the Complaint by 16 days (Doc. No. 13). This request would not affect any other court-ordered deadline.
IT IS SO ORDERED. Defendants' deadline to respond to the Complaint shall be February 19, 2018.
Source: Leagle