Abrantes v. Fitness Evolution, LLC, 1:16-cv-00903-LJO-SKO. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20171228a73
Visitors: 14
Filed: Dec. 27, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 27, 2017
Summary: ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE (Doc. 67) SHEILA K. OBERTO , Magistrate Judge . On December 21, 2017, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing Plaintiffs Jogert Abrantes' and Joanne Goss' individual claims with prejudice, and Plaintiffs' class claims without prejudice. (Doc. 67.) In light of the parties' stipulation, Plaintiffs' individual claims have been dismissed with prejudice, Plaintiffs' class claims have been dismissed without prejudice, and this ac
Summary: ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE (Doc. 67) SHEILA K. OBERTO , Magistrate Judge . On December 21, 2017, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing Plaintiffs Jogert Abrantes' and Joanne Goss' individual claims with prejudice, and Plaintiffs' class claims without prejudice. (Doc. 67.) In light of the parties' stipulation, Plaintiffs' individual claims have been dismissed with prejudice, Plaintiffs' class claims have been dismissed without prejudice, and this act..
More
ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE
(Doc. 67)
SHEILA K. OBERTO, Magistrate Judge.
On December 21, 2017, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing Plaintiffs Jogert Abrantes' and Joanne Goss' individual claims with prejudice, and Plaintiffs' class claims without prejudice. (Doc. 67.)
In light of the parties' stipulation, Plaintiffs' individual claims have been dismissed with prejudice, Plaintiffs' class claims have been dismissed without prejudice, and this action has been terminated. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle