(PS) Bumagat v. Shillinger, 2:17-cv-02008-TLN-GGH. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20171228b02
Visitors: 12
Filed: Dec. 27, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 27, 2017
Summary: ORDER GREGORY G. HOLLOWS , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, who has been granted in forma pauperis status, is proceeding in this action pro se. The action was accordingly referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 302(c)(21). On November 21, 2017, defendants County of Solano and Furlong filed a motion to dismiss. ECF No. 15. Plaintiff has not responded to the motion. Local Rule 230(c) provides that opposition to the granting of a motion must be filed fourteen days preceding the noticed heari
Summary: ORDER GREGORY G. HOLLOWS , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, who has been granted in forma pauperis status, is proceeding in this action pro se. The action was accordingly referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 302(c)(21). On November 21, 2017, defendants County of Solano and Furlong filed a motion to dismiss. ECF No. 15. Plaintiff has not responded to the motion. Local Rule 230(c) provides that opposition to the granting of a motion must be filed fourteen days preceding the noticed hearin..
More
ORDER
GREGORY G. HOLLOWS, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff, who has been granted in forma pauperis status, is proceeding in this action pro se. The action was accordingly referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 302(c)(21). On November 21, 2017, defendants County of Solano and Furlong filed a motion to dismiss. ECF No. 15. Plaintiff has not responded to the motion.
Local Rule 230(c) provides that opposition to the granting of a motion must be filed fourteen days preceding the noticed hearing date. The Local Rule further provides that "[n]o party will be entitled to be heard in opposition to a motion at oral arguments if written opposition to the motion has not been timely filed by that party." In addition, Local Rule 230(i) provides that failure to appear may be deemed withdrawal of opposition to the motion or may result in sanctions. Finally, Local Rule 110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules "may be grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent power of the Court."
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The motion hearing date of January 4, 2018 is CONTINUED to January 18, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom No. 9 and;
2. Plaintiff shall file a declaration explaining why no opposition was timely filed, and shall file an opposition — or a Statement of Non-Opposition — to the motion, no later than January 4, 2018. Failure to file the declaration, or an opposition, or to appear at the hearing will be deemed as a statement of non-opposition and shall result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).
Source: Leagle
