Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Baldizon v. Macomber, 2:17-cv-00228-WBS-AC. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180104949 Visitors: 8
Filed: Jan. 03, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 03, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE: INITIAL DISCLOSURES WILLIAM B. SHUBB , District Judge . Plaintiffs Janette Baldizon and Ana Baldizon, and Defendant Macomber, through their respective counsel, stipulate as follows: 1. Under the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order (ECF No. 33), the parties are required to submit Initial Disclosures by January 5, 2018; 2. On December 18, 2017, the Court granted Defendant Macomber's Motion to Dismiss with Leave to Amend (ECF No. 39), and Plaintiffs ar
More

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE: INITIAL DISCLOSURES

Plaintiffs Janette Baldizon and Ana Baldizon, and Defendant Macomber, through their respective counsel, stipulate as follows:

1. Under the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order (ECF No. 33), the parties are required to submit Initial Disclosures by January 5, 2018;

2. On December 18, 2017, the Court granted Defendant Macomber's Motion to Dismiss with Leave to Amend (ECF No. 39), and Plaintiffs are required to file an amended complaint by January 8, 2018;

3. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1), Macomber is required to disclose the identities of witnesses and documents which support his defenses in this matter;

4. Until Plaintiffs file an amended complaint, Macomber will be unable to determine which defenses apply to this matter, and so will be unable to submit Initial Disclosures under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1); and

5. It is agreed that the deadline to submit Initial Disclosures is extended to fifteen days after the filing of an Answer by Macomber, or fifteen days after the Court denies a Motion to Dismiss filed by Macomber, whichever event occurs first.

ORDER

In light of the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, it is ordered that the deadline to submit Initial Disclosures is extended to fifteen days after the filing of an Answer by Macomber, or fifteen days after the Court denies a Motion to Dismiss filed by Macomber, whichever event occurs first.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer