Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Pelling v. Amtrak, 2:15-cv-01378-MCE-KJN. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180105657 Visitors: 10
Filed: Jan. 03, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 03, 2018
Summary: ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATED MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT AGAINST THE CITY OF SACRAMENTO, WITH PREJUDICE, PURSUANT TO FRCP RULE 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. , District Judge . THE COURT, having reviewed and approved the Joint Stipulated Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Leslie Pelling's Complaint against Defendant City of Sacramento, with prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), orders as follows: IT IS ORDERED THAT the Joint Stipulated M
More

ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATED MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT AGAINST THE CITY OF SACRAMENTO, WITH PREJUDICE, PURSUANT TO FRCP RULE 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)

THE COURT, having reviewed and approved the Joint Stipulated Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Leslie Pelling's Complaint against Defendant City of Sacramento, with prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), orders as follows:

IT IS ORDERED THAT the Joint Stipulated Motion to Dismiss is (ECF No. 123 approved.

The Court accordingly dismisses Plaintiff Leslie Pelling's Civil Complaint in United States District Court, Case Number 2:15-CV-01378-MCE-KJN against Defendant City of Sacramento, with prejudice. Plaintiff Leslie Pelling and Defendant City of Sacramento each shall waive and bear their own costs, expenses, and attorney's fees with respect to any claims they have or had against each other.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer