(SS) Loza v. Commissioner of Social Security, 1:17-cv-0598-JLT. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180109649
Visitors: 13
Filed: Jan. 08, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 08, 2018
Summary: ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO THE OPENING BRIEF (Doc. 15) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . On January 4, 2018, the parties stipulated for an extension of time for Defendant to file a response to Plaintiff's opening brief. (Doc. 15) Notably, the Scheduling Order permits a single thirty-day extension by the stipulation of parties (Doc. 5 at 4), and this is the first extension requested by either party. Based upon the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appear
Summary: ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO THE OPENING BRIEF (Doc. 15) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . On January 4, 2018, the parties stipulated for an extension of time for Defendant to file a response to Plaintiff's opening brief. (Doc. 15) Notably, the Scheduling Order permits a single thirty-day extension by the stipulation of parties (Doc. 5 at 4), and this is the first extension requested by either party. Based upon the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appeari..
More
ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO THE OPENING BRIEF
(Doc. 15)
JENNIFER L. THURSTON, Magistrate Judge.
On January 4, 2018, the parties stipulated for an extension of time for Defendant to file a response to Plaintiff's opening brief. (Doc. 15) Notably, the Scheduling Order permits a single thirty-day extension by the stipulation of parties (Doc. 5 at 4), and this is the first extension requested by either party. Based upon the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, the Court ORDERS:
1. The request for an extension of time is GRANTED; and
2. Defendant SHALL file a response to the opening brief no later than February 3, 2018.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
