Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

(PS) Richardson v. Sessions, 2:17-cv-1838 JAM AC PS. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180109693 Visitors: 4
Filed: Jan. 08, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 08, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON DEFENDANT BECERRA'S MOTION TO DISMISS; PROPOSED ORDER ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Michael Richardson and Defendant Xavier Becerra, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. Plaintiff filed his complaint in this action on September 5, 2017. He is appearing in this action pro per. 2. On November 27, 2017, Defendant Becerra responded to the complaint by filing a motion to dismi
More

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON DEFENDANT BECERRA'S MOTION TO DISMISS; PROPOSED ORDER

Plaintiff Michael Richardson and Defendant Xavier Becerra, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California, hereby stipulate as follows:

1. Plaintiff filed his complaint in this action on September 5, 2017. He is appearing in this action pro per.

2. On November 27, 2017, Defendant Becerra responded to the complaint by filing a motion to dismiss. The motion is currently set for hearing on January 24, 2018.

3. Plaintiff and Defendant Becerra hereby agree and stipulate to continue the hearing date to February 14, 2018, at 10:00 a.m. in courtroom 26. They further stipulate that the deadlines for opposition and reply briefs in connection with the motion shall be calculated based upon the new hearing date.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer