Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

McCallum v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 1:17-cv-01481-AWI-SAB. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180111964 Visitors: 5
Filed: Jan. 10, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 10, 2018
Summary: ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANT TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT ISSUE FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH DECEMBER 7, 2017 ORDER (ECF No. 10) FIVE DAY DEADLINE STANLEY A. BOONE , Magistrate Judge . On October 3, 2017, Plaintiffs David McCallum and Donna McCallum ("Plaintiffs") filed this action in Fresno County Superior Court. (ECF No. 1-1.) On November 3, 2017, Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Defendant") removed the action to the Eastern District of California. (ECF No. 1.) On December 7, 201
More

ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANT TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT ISSUE FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH DECEMBER 7, 2017 ORDER

(ECF No. 10)

FIVE DAY DEADLINE

On October 3, 2017, Plaintiffs David McCallum and Donna McCallum ("Plaintiffs") filed this action in Fresno County Superior Court. (ECF No. 1-1.) On November 3, 2017, Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Defendant") removed the action to the Eastern District of California. (ECF No. 1.) On December 7, 2017, Defendant filed a notice of settlement. (ECF No. 9.) On December 7, 2017, an order issued requiring the parties to file dispositional documents within thirty thirty days. More than thirty days have passed and the parties have not complied with or otherwise responded to the December 7, 2017 order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within five (5) days from the date of service of this order, Defendant shall show cause in writing why sanctions should not issue for the failure to comply with the December 7, 2017 order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer