Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

A.V. v. Panama Buena Vista Union School District, 1:15-cv-00246-MCE-JLT. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180112813 Visitors: 5
Filed: Jan. 11, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 11, 2018
Summary: ORDER REOPENING CASE MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. , District Judge . The Court is in receipt of Defendant Panama-Buena Vista Union School District's Ex Parte Request for Clarification on Case Status (ECF No. 146), filed on January 10, 2018 following this Court's adjudication of Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment— Appeal of Administrative Hearing Decisions (ECF No. 116) by Memorandum and Order filed January 9, 2018 (ECF No. 141). Plaintiff correctly points out that the Memorandum and Order
More

ORDER REOPENING CASE

The Court is in receipt of Defendant Panama-Buena Vista Union School District's Ex Parte Request for Clarification on Case Status (ECF No. 146), filed on January 10, 2018 following this Court's adjudication of Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment— Appeal of Administrative Hearing Decisions (ECF No. 116) by Memorandum and Order filed January 9, 2018 (ECF No. 141). Plaintiff correctly points out that the Memorandum and Order in fact disposed only of Plaintiff's appeal as to the subject OAH decisions on Plaintiff's IDEA claims and did not encompass Plaintiff's non-IDEA claims, which include claims under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 701, et seq., as well as claims for discrimination and retaliation on the basis of disability and national origin under both Section 504 and Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act.

Consequently, the last sentence of the Court's January 9, 2018 Memorandum and Order, which directed the Clerk of Court to close the file, was made in error and is hereby stricken. The Clerk is therefore ordered to reopen the case in order to permit the adjudication of Plaintiff's remaining claims as enumerated above. The Court notes that Plaintiff filed a Third Amended Complaint on December 4, 2017 (ECF No. 138), and Defendant District, in turn, has filed a Motion to Dismiss/Motion to Strike (ECF No. 138) as to said Third Amended Complaint. That Motion was set for hearing on January 25, 2018. The Court notes that Plaintiff's Opposition (ECF No. 138) to the Motion has already been filed; Defendant District is directed to file its reply, if any, not later than January 22, 2018.

The parties are also directed to file a Joint Status Report not later than thirty (30) days following the Court's ruling on Defendant's currently pending Motion to Dismiss/Motion to Strike which proposes new deadlines for adjudicating such claims as may be remaining after that ruling.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer