Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Ledesma v. City of Vallejo, 2:17-cv-00106-MCE-CKD. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180112885 Visitors: 17
Filed: Jan. 10, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 10, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER; ORDER THEREON MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY ALL PARTIES to this action by and through their attorneys of record, that in order to protect the confidentiality of the records described below, any of said records disclosed are subject to a protective order and designated as "Confidential Material" as follows: 1. Records produced by defendants' in the production of documents pertaining to: • Citizen complaints and inte
More

STIPULATION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER; ORDER THEREON

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY ALL PARTIES to this action by and through their attorneys of record, that in order to protect the confidentiality of the records described below, any of said records disclosed are subject to a protective order and designated as "Confidential Material" as follows:

1. Records produced by defendants' in the production of documents pertaining to: • Citizen complaints and internal affairs investigations related to alleged excessive force or alleged dishonesty against Defendant Blain within the last five years. • Citizen complaints and internal affairs investigations related to alleged excessive force or alleged dishonesty against Defendant DeMarco within the last five years.

2. Confidential material may not be disclosed except as set forth in paragraphs 3-5.

3. Confidential Material may be disclosed only to the following persons:

a. Counsel for any party to this action. b. Paralegal, stenographic, clerical and secretarial personnel regularly employed by counsel referred to in 3(a); c. Court personnel including stenographic reporters engaged in such proceedings as are necessarily incidental to preparation for the trial of this action; d. Any outside expert or consultant retained in connection with this action, and not otherwise employed by either party; e. Any "in house" expert designated by defendant to testify at trial in this matter; f. Witnesses, other than the plaintiffs herein, who may have the documents disclosed to them during deposition proceedings; the witnesses may not leave the depositions with copies of the documents, and shall be bound by the provisions of paragraph 5; g. Any Neutral Evaluator or other designated ADR provider; h. Parties to this action; and i. The jury, should this matter go to trial.

4. Each person to whom disclosure is made, with the exception of counsel who are presumed to know of the contents of this protective order, shall, prior to disclosure: (1) be provided with a copy of this order by the person furnishing him/her such material, and (2) agree on the record or in writing that she/he has read the protective order and that she/he understand the provisions of the protective order. Such person must also consent to be subject to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court, Eastern District of California, with respect to any proceeding relating to the enforcement of this order. Defendant City of Vallejo and the named defendants herein shall be entitled to retain possession of the original writings described above. Nothing in this paragraph 4 is intended to prevent officials or employees of the City of Vallejo or other authorized government officials or any other persons from having access to the documents if they would have had access in the normal course of their job duties or rights as a citizen. Further, nothing in this order prevents a witness from disclosing events or activities personal to them, i.e., a witness can disclose to others previous information given to the City of Vallejo with respect to what she/he saw, heard, or otherwise sensed.

5. At the conclusion of the trial and of any appeal or upon other termination of this litigation, all Confidential Material received under the provision of this order (including any copies made) shall be delivered back to the City of Vallejo. Provisions of this order insofar as they restrict disclosure and use of the material shall be in effect until all Confidential Material (including all copies thereof) are returned to defendants.

6. Should a party intend to file Confidential Material with the court, as an exhibit to a pleading or otherwise, that party must first notify all other parties (through their attorneys), in writing and filed with the court, no less than fourteen days before the intended filing date, giving any such party reasonable notice and an opportunity to apply to the court for an order to file the material under seal. No document shall be filed under seal unless a party secures a court order allowing the filing of a document under seal in accordance with the provisions of E.D. Local Rule 141.

7. Nothing in this order shall preclude a party from showing or disclosing any documents, e.g., deposition transcript, pleading or brief, which otherwise contain Confidential Material as defined in paragraph 1, as long as such document has been redacted so as to prevent disclosure of such Confidential Material.

8. The foregoing is without prejudice to the right of any party (a) to apply to the Court for a further protective order relating to any Confidential Material or relating to discovery in this litigation; (b) to apply to the Court for an order removing the Confidential Material designation from any document; and (c) to apply to the Court for an order compelling production of documents or modification of this order or for any order permitting disclosure of Confidential Materials beyond the terms of this order.

9. Upon receipt of this Protective Order and disclosure of the Confidential Material, it will be presumed that plaintiffs know the contents of this Protective Order, understand the provisions of this Protective Order and consent to be subject to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court, Eastern District, with respect to any proceeding relating to the enforcement of this Protective Order.

10. Confidential Material disclosed may be used in the litigation of this action only, and not for any other purpose.

11. Violation of the terms of this Protective Order MAY SUBJECT a party to any and all permissible SANCTIONS, including dismissal.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer