(HC) Barbour v. Matevousian, 1:17-cv-00965-JLT (HC). (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180124910
Visitors: 20
Filed: Jan. 23, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 23, 2018
Summary: ORDER DENYING PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Doc. 15] JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . On January 16, 2018, Petitioner filed the instant motion for summary judgment. Petitioner claims that Respondent failed to file an answer to the petition as ordered by the Court; he is mistaken. On November 8, 2017, Respondent filed a response to the petition in accordance with the Court's order. (Doc. 14) A traverse was due on or before December 11, 2018, and the petition is currentl
Summary: ORDER DENYING PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Doc. 15] JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . On January 16, 2018, Petitioner filed the instant motion for summary judgment. Petitioner claims that Respondent failed to file an answer to the petition as ordered by the Court; he is mistaken. On November 8, 2017, Respondent filed a response to the petition in accordance with the Court's order. (Doc. 14) A traverse was due on or before December 11, 2018, and the petition is currently..
More
ORDER DENYING PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
[Doc. 15]
JENNIFER L. THURSTON, Magistrate Judge.
On January 16, 2018, Petitioner filed the instant motion for summary judgment. Petitioner claims that Respondent failed to file an answer to the petition as ordered by the Court; he is mistaken. On November 8, 2017, Respondent filed a response to the petition in accordance with the Court's order. (Doc. 14) A traverse was due on or before December 11, 2018, and the petition is currently pending review by the Court.
Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS that Petitioner's motion for summary judgment is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
