Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

(PC) Charles Windham v. Rodriguez, 1:16-cv-00979-AWI-SAB (PC). (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180126f85 Visitors: 22
Filed: Jan. 25, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 25, 2018
Summary: ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE PURSUANT TO PARTIES' STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL (ECF No. 53) STANLEY A. BOONE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Charles Windham is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. On December 25, 2017, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss this action with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (ECF No. 53.) Rule 41(a)(1)(A
More

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE PURSUANT TO PARTIES' STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

(ECF No. 53)

Plaintiff Charles Windham is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

On December 25, 2017, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss this action with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (ECF No. 53.)

Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) provides in pertinent part that, "the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared. A voluntary stipulation to dismiss an action pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) automatically terminates the action without operation of a court order. Black Rock City, LLC v. Pershing Cty. Bd. of Comm'rs, 637 F. App'x 488 (9th Cir. 2016) (citing Commercial Space Mgmt. Co. v. Boeing Co., 193 F.3d 1074, 1077 (9th Cir. 1999)).

In this case, Plaintiff and counsel for Defendant Rodriguez have signed and dated a stipulation to dismiss this action, and filed it with the Court.

In light of parties' stipulation for voluntary dismissal, this action is terminated by operation of law without further order from the Court. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). All pending motions and deadlines are terminated. Each party is to bear its own litigation costs, fees, and expenses of any type, including attorney's fees. There is no prevailing party in this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer