Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Lull v. County of Sacramento, 2:16-cv-01093-KJM-CKD. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180130771 Visitors: 16
Filed: Jan. 23, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 23, 2018
Summary: FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE SCHEDULING ORDER KIMBERLY J. MUELLER , District Judge . The parties jointly request (ECF No. 55) to amend dates in the pretrial scheduling order (ECF No. 25). Good cause appearing, the court GRANTS this request, as follows: Description Existing Date New Date Discovery Cutoff January 5, 2018 July 6, 2018 Expert Disclosures February 12, 2018 August 13, 2018 Supplemental E
More

FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE SCHEDULING ORDER

The parties jointly request (ECF No. 55) to amend dates in the pretrial scheduling order (ECF No. 25). Good cause appearing, the court GRANTS this request, as follows:

Description Existing Date New Date Discovery Cutoff January 5, 2018 July 6, 2018 Expert Disclosures February 12, 2018 August 13, 2018 Supplemental Expert Disclosures March 5, 2018 September 3, 2018 Completion of Expert Discovery April 6, 2018 October 5, 2018 All Dispositive Motions Hearing Date May 4, 2018 November 2, 2018 File Joint Pretrial Conference Statement August 31, 2018 VACATED Final Pretrial Conference September 21,2018 VACATED Trial Briefs Due October 15, 2018 VACATED Jury Trial October 29, 2018 VACATED

This amendment does not alter any other portions of the initial scheduling order (ECF No. 25).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer