(SS) Mendez v. Commissioner of Social Security, 2:17-cv-00332 AC. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180130776
Visitors: 18
Filed: Jan. 24, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 24, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND [ PROPOSED ] ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME ALLISON CLAIRE , District Judge . IT IS STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended until February 22, 2018. This is Defendant's third request for an extension of time to respond. Defense counsel requires additional time to fully review the administrative record and consider the government's posi
Summary: STIPULATION AND [ PROPOSED ] ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME ALLISON CLAIRE , District Judge . IT IS STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended until February 22, 2018. This is Defendant's third request for an extension of time to respond. Defense counsel requires additional time to fully review the administrative record and consider the government's posit..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME
ALLISON CLAIRE, District Judge.
IT IS STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended until February 22, 2018. This is Defendant's third request for an extension of time to respond. Defense counsel requires additional time to fully review the administrative record and consider the government's position due to conflicting due dates and the uncertainty caused by the brief lapse in government funding. Plaintiff's counsel does not object and agrees that all subsequent deadlines should be accordingly extended.
ORDER
APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
