(DP) San Nicolas v. Ayers, 1:06-cv-00942-DAD. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180130b31
Visitors: 15
Filed: Jan. 28, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 28, 2018
Summary: ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED REQUEST TO FILE DOCUMENT UNDER SEAL (Doc. Nos. 174, 175 & 176) DALE A. DROZD , District Judge . Before the court is petitioner's January 25, 2018 request to file under seal his reply to the memorandum of points and authorities in opposition to the sealed portion of the petition for writ of habeas corpus (sealed claim 1 of the addendum petition), as amended and supplemented. Petitioner states the document proposed for sealing discusses confidential information refle
Summary: ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED REQUEST TO FILE DOCUMENT UNDER SEAL (Doc. Nos. 174, 175 & 176) DALE A. DROZD , District Judge . Before the court is petitioner's January 25, 2018 request to file under seal his reply to the memorandum of points and authorities in opposition to the sealed portion of the petition for writ of habeas corpus (sealed claim 1 of the addendum petition), as amended and supplemented. Petitioner states the document proposed for sealing discusses confidential information reflec..
More
ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED REQUEST TO FILE DOCUMENT UNDER SEAL
(Doc. Nos. 174, 175 & 176)
DALE A. DROZD, District Judge.
Before the court is petitioner's January 25, 2018 request to file under seal his reply to the memorandum of points and authorities in opposition to the sealed portion of the petition for writ of habeas corpus (sealed claim 1 of the addendum petition), as amended and supplemented. Petitioner states the document proposed for sealing discusses confidential information reflected in sealed claim 1. Petitioner also represents that counsel for respondent, Deputy Attorney General Angelo Edralin, does not oppose his amended request to seal.
The court previously ordered that all pleadings addressing petitioner's sealed claim 1 be filed under seal and served upon opposing counsel. (See Doc. No. 156.)
Accordingly,
1. The Clerk of the Court is directed to file under seal petitioner's reply to the memorandum of points and authorities in opposition to the sealed portion of the petition for writ of habeas corpus, totaling nine (9) pages, with service upon only counsel for respondent,
2. Petitioner's reply and the information set forth therein is confidential and shall not be disclosed, in whole or part, to any person other than the court and court staff and individually named counsel for the parties for their use solely in connection with litigation of the habeas corpus proceeding pending before this court,
3. No publicly filed document shall include the above document and/or the information set forth therein unless authorized by the court to be filed under seal, and
4. All provisions of this order shall continue to be binding after the conclusion of this habeas corpus proceeding and specifically shall apply in the event of a retrial of all or any portion of petitioner's criminal case, except that either party maintains the right to request modification or vacation of this order upon entry of final judgment.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
