Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Griffiths v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 1:16-cv-01438-DAD-JLT. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180131a72 Visitors: 17
Filed: Jan. 30, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 30, 2018
Summary: ORDER CLOSING CASE (Doc. 38) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . The parties have settled their case and have stipulated to the action being dismissed with prejudice. (Doc. 38) The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 makes such stipulations effective immediately with further order of the Court. Because all parties who have appeared in the action signed the stipulation (Doc. 22), it "automatically terminate[d] the action." Wilson v. City of San Jose , 111 F.3d 688 , 692 (9th Ci
More

ORDER CLOSING CASE

(Doc. 38)

The parties have settled their case and have stipulated to the action being dismissed with prejudice. (Doc. 38) The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 makes such stipulations effective immediately with further order of the Court. Because all parties who have appeared in the action signed the stipulation (Doc. 22), it "automatically terminate[d] the action." Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer