(PC) Smith v. Martinez,, 1:17-cv-01092-AWI-MJS (PC). (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180208795
Visitors: 3
Filed: Feb. 06, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 06, 2018
Summary: ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION DEMANDING A RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT (ECF No. 25) MICHAEL J. SENG , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. The matter proceeds on Plaintiff's First Amendment retaliation claim against Defendant Martinez. Before the Court is Plaintiff's motion demanding that Defendant Martinez answer the complaint. (ECF No. 25.) On February 5, 2018, Defendant
Summary: ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION DEMANDING A RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT (ECF No. 25) MICHAEL J. SENG , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. The matter proceeds on Plaintiff's First Amendment retaliation claim against Defendant Martinez. Before the Court is Plaintiff's motion demanding that Defendant Martinez answer the complaint. (ECF No. 25.) On February 5, 2018, Defendant ..
More
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION DEMANDING A RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT
(ECF No. 25)
MICHAEL J. SENG, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter proceeds on Plaintiff's First Amendment retaliation claim against Defendant Martinez.
Before the Court is Plaintiff's motion demanding that Defendant Martinez answer the complaint. (ECF No. 25.) On February 5, 2018, Defendant Martinez filed an answer to the complaint. (ECF No. 26.)
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion (ECF No. 25) is DENIED as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
